Wednesday, August 28, 2013
Syrian
Wednesday, August 28, 2013 by DXTR corporation
Syrian Electronic Army Attack Western Interests
Author: Arli Aditya Parikshit - detikinetWednesday, 28/08/2013 9:41 PMhttp://images.detik.com/content/2013/08/28/398/syrianelectronicarmy460.jpg Illustration (digitaltrends)
Jakarta - A few hours ago, a hacker group called the Syrian Electronic Army (SEA) website hacked Twitter, Facebook, New York Times, and the Huffington Post.
Case, the DNS from NYTimes.com directed to a page that shows the message "Hacked by SEA '. Twitter domain registration is also replaced by them.
SEA twitter account, which is @ Official_SEA16, claiming that they are responsible for the hacks. Now, these three web sites that appear to have been working normally again.
Previously, SEA known to have hacked the BBC, National Public Radio, Human Rights Watch, The Onion, and the Financial Times. What really happened?
Regarding cursory SEA
Based on information from Wikipedia, SEA is an association of the hackers, who allegedly a front with pro-Assad government in Syria. In addition to targeting western party websites, SEA also attacked pro-Syrian opposition website, the anti-Assad.
SEA own web site was launched in May 2011, although as of this writing is loaded, the web site can not be accessed.
On many occasions, SEA representatives released a statement always patriotic, that they are young people who protect the nation and the country itself.
In addition to web hack pro west and pro-opposition, spam SEA also been posted on a Facebook account Barrack Obama and Nicholas Sarkozy (former French President).
One of them is a phenomenal offensive Twitter account hacked Associated Press, which finally tweeted a false claim that the White House was bombed, and President Barack Obama were injured, which led to the S & P 500 plummeted.
Is This False Flag Operation?
False flag operation is an intelligence operation that sets up a destructive event, so that the enemy be responsible diframe of the event.
Gestapo, Nazi German intelligence, is the party who popularized the false flag action. It happened during the Reichstag - German parliament (Bundestag now) - mysteriously burned in 1930.
Soon after the incident, Hitler condemned the Jews and the Communist conspiracy as arsonists. Later, after World War II ended, the arsonists are known to the Nazis themselves, in order to become a political justification for the 'final solution' (endlosung) they are against Jews and Communists.
Besides burning reichstag, alleged that the Tonkin Gulf incident that preceded the war in Vietnam is also false flag, although it is not clear which party is responsible.
Why is this discourse presented false flag? Very interesting because if hacks speculated that the attack was directed to it, but the facts on the ground do not support it.
If the flag is false, how far? It is still very speculative, because the evidence does not exist. We must be careful to use the term false flag, as most proponents of this theory is a conspiracy theory followers.
Based on his own analysis of the west side, known SEA has absolutely no official affiliation with the pro-Assad Syrian government.
The interesting thing is, Bashir al Assad himself has praised the actions of the SEA in a television broadcast. However, this praise is not an indication or prove that SEA is officially supported by the Syrian government.
So far, we can be sure that the SEA motive is pure Syria represent the younger generation, because there is no evidence that a cyber war between the west and Syria was a false flag operation, and what really happened will be known many years again, when intelligence documents that discuss This cyber-war in undisclosed to the public.
We can hypothesize, if not concluded, that the SEA is an independent entity that is supported by the Syrian people themselves, either domestically or diaspora.
Raison d'etre Invasion of Syria
Electronic attack (hacking) to the west web site may be one justification for retaliation to the Syrian side. Although can not be a justification for a military invasion, but it can open a cyber war front on a large scale, which may be terminated by a military invasion.
However, the statement needs careful scrutiny NATO officials in the media, that they tend to be compact. Unlike the situation in 2003, which divided the NATO command structure, because France and Germany opposed the invasion of Iraq, it did not happen in the case of Syria.
If this is the situation heats up, it's not impossible to decide NATO military invasion, as happened in the case of Lybia. On the other hand, the Russians and the Chinese, as a permanent member of the UN Security Council, has always firmly rejected any idea of the West to carry out a military invasion.
However, if Russia and China's veto could prevent the invasion, it was a big question mark. Veto they proved ineffective in preventing the United States and British invasion of Iraq in 2003.
One thing to note, that if the invasion finally happens, it all starts with cyber warfare, which has been going on since 2011.
However, we all agree never to war, because it is definitely going to fall victim to the people / innocent civilians. Laid down their arms and advanced to the negotiating table is always the best solution for all parties.
Source:DETIK.COM Tags:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Responses to “Syrian”
Post a Comment